Field crew performance

Crew performance measured as variance against the plan rather than raw duration, layered verdict-first: who to worry about, how bad and where, then why and whether it is improving.

What it is

The build-side half of Team. A verdict card per crew — Ahead of plan, On plan, Running late — with average days versus plan and a proportional reliability rule. Clicking a card scopes every panel below it. Then a schedule-reliability mix, a diverging bar of days off plan by stage around a zero line, a ranked chart of where lost days went, and a monthly variance trend.

Also called: crew analytics · which crew runs late · crew schedule performance · days off plan · which crew is behind · crew reliability · crew comparison

See it
Field crew performance
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Ivy Brubaker — 30×40 Garage
Framing
Sutter Kline — Barndominium
Concrete
Gideon Alt — Equipment Storage
Trim
Marlin Hoover — 40×64 Shop
Framing
Ronan Petsch — Barndominium
Concrete
Framing crewConcrete crewTrim crew
Team › Field: three verdict cards with '+1.8d avg vs plan' and a tri-colour reliability rule, above the diverging 'Days Off Plan, by Stage' chart. FieldPerformance.tsx. Sample data — no customer information appears here.
How it works
  1. 1Only completed stages with a recorded variance are counted.
  2. 2Per crew: early / on time / late counts, average variance, total days lost, reliability percentage and the single worst slip with its project, stage and recorded reason.
  3. 3Cards are sorted worst-first so the crew needing attention is read, not found.
  4. 4Selecting a crew filters every chart below and pins an explicit banner stating the scope.
  5. 5Days off plan is plotted per stage per crew, coloured by crew and centred on a zero reference line.
Why we built it

'when you look at stage completion per crew, it's hard to understand the analytics and the insights that come from it.' The file lists the three specific defects: names clipped to 16 units so two crews read identically; a bar scaled as avgDays ÷ (plannedAvg × 2), 'a scale with no meaning'; and worst, 'It plotted DURATION, which is dominated by how big the stage is. Framing takes longer than dirt work on every crew, so the longest bars just marked the biggest stages, not the slowest crews.' The fix is stated as a principle: 'Plot VARIANCE AGAINST PLAN, not duration. That single change makes zero the meaningful centre, puts every stage on one comparable scale, and makes "who is behind" the thing you see first instead of the thing you compute.'

The problem
  • Duration charts ranked stages by size, not crews by performance.
  • There was no drawn reference for 'on plan', so being off plan could not be read off the chart.
  • Crew names were truncated to the point of being indistinguishable.
Sound familiar?
What you get
Zero is the centre, so behind and ahead are readable at a glance.
Every stage is on one comparable scale regardless of its size.
The crew to talk to today is the first card on the page.
What's inside
Crew cards that filter the page
Selecting a crew card scopes every chart below it, and a banner states the scope explicitly rather than leaving it to be inferred.
Schedule reliability
A 100%-stacked bar per crew showing the share of their stages that finished early, on time or late.
Days off plan by stage
Average days over or under the planned duration, per stage per crew, drawn around a zero reference line.
Where the lost days went
Every recorded delay reason ranked by the total days it cost, with a footnote saying whether it is a crew problem or a systemic one.
Variance trend
Average days off plan per month, one line per crew, around a zero rule — a line falling toward zero is a crew getting back on schedule.
Verdict cards that actually filter
Selecting a crew's verdict card scopes every panel below it, instead of highlighting a card while the charts keep showing everyone.

See it on your own jobs

Twenty minutes, your numbers, no slide deck. We’ll build one of your real buildings in front of you and send you the estimate link at the end — yours to keep either way.

or keep browsing features →