The did-it-work chart. Months are bucketed from the stage's actual end date (or its planned end when there is none). The tooltip lists each crew's value with its sample size and adds a sentence naming who lost the most ground that month — or, when a crew is selected, whether that month finished ahead, behind or exactly on plan.
Also called: are we getting better · monthly schedule trend · improving or slipping · trend over time · is the crew improving · monthly variance
- 1Completed stages are grouped by year-month and crew, and averaged.
- 2A ReferenceLine at y=0 anchors the chart; ticks carry explicit signs.
- 3Rendered only when there is more than one month of data.
- 4connectNulls keeps a crew's line continuous across a month it did not work.
The panel hint states the reading instruction: 'A line falling toward zero is a crew getting back on schedule.' The footnote logic exists because a manager's next question after 'who' is always 'is it improving'.
- Performance was only ever a snapshot, never a direction.
- Improvement after a coaching conversation could not be evidenced.
See it on your own jobs
Twenty minutes, your numbers, no slide deck. We’ll build one of your real buildings in front of you and send you the estimate link at the end — yours to keep either way.
or keep browsing features →