A retention surface. The thesis is written into the engine: an account that signs up and does not wire the product into its business leaves. So for every account it tracks the milestones that make it stick, real usage, thirty-day activity metrics, and rolls them into a score, a risk level and a list of alerts with the reason spelled out.
Also called: am I getting value · account health · churn risk · are they using it · customer success
- 1The overview table ranks accounts worst-first and can sort by score, longest since active, fewest sessions, least set up or most alerts.
- 2Summary tiles count healthy, watch, at risk, churn risk and high alerts, and double as filters.
- 3Clicking an account opens the full picture — score and why, alerts, usage, module heat, weekday-by-hour heat map, per-person breakdown, the milestone ledger with dates and thirty-day counters.
- 4The same panel is embedded as the Success tab on the account itself.
- 5Rows come from today's snapshot, recomputed on demand when missing or more than three hours old.
- 6Demo accounts are excluded entirely from every retention number.
The engine states the thesis: 'The retention thesis: an account that signs up and doesn't wire the product into its business leaves.' Demo exclusion has its own paragraph: 'every retention number this module computes… is a claim about a paying customer's behaviour. A seeded demo would score however the seeder happened to shape it, and would then sit in the roster and skew the averages beside real accounts.'
- Disengagement was invisible until a cancellation.
- Health was judged by whoever last spoke to a customer.
- Seeded demo data would have polluted every retention average.
See it on your own jobs
Twenty minutes, your numbers, no slide deck. We’ll build one of your real buildings in front of you and send you the estimate link at the end — yours to keep either way.
or keep browsing features →