A pre-submission compliance check that actually loads the URLs being filed and inspects them: is the privacy policy public with no login wall, does it carry the mobile-information non-sharing statement, are the terms public and specific to the messaging programme, and is the terms URL being sent at all.
Also called: campaign rejected · privacy policy rejected · 30908 · wasted the registration fee
- 1Each check returns pass / warn / fail with plain-language detail and whether it is blocking
- 2A blocking fail stops submission in the wizard
- 3A check that cannot be completed — site down, timeout — is a WARNING, never a block
- 4Only positive evidence of a broken rule refuses a submission
Our own first campaign was rejected for an unverifiable privacy policy and non-compliant terms, after the brand fee had already been spent, leaving a purchased number unusable for over a month. Every rule it broke was mechanically checkable in advance, and a checklist buried in a help doc would have been read by nobody. Before a filing is submitted the platform now fetches and reads the account's privacy and terms pages and blocks the application if a rule is provably broken, rather than letting a builder spend money on a registration that can already be shown to fail.
- Money and review cycles spent on filings that were always going to fail
- Compliance rules stated only in documentation nobody reads
See it on your own jobs
Twenty minutes, your numbers, no slide deck. We’ll build one of your real buildings in front of you and send you the estimate link at the end — yours to keep either way.
or keep browsing features →