Demo requests captured as a consent record

The public demo form stores who consented, to what exact wording, from which page, when, and from what IP — storing the wording verbatim rather than referencing it.

What it is

The 'Book my demo' form on the public site writes a record built for messaging-compliance review, not just a lead row. The consent wording is stored word-for-word alongside the submission, because the site copy will change and the record must keep meaning what it meant on the day it was signed. It is public by necessity, rate limited by IP, and never echoes back what it stored.

Also called: book a demo · opt in record · TCPA consent · A2P compliance · proof of consent

See it
Demo requests captured as a consent record
Area
Platform & Admin
Group
Marketing Site & Compliance
Scope
Stands on its own
Solves
3 named problems
01A logged-out visitor submits the form
02The record captures the person, the verbatim consent wording shown on the page, the page URL, the timestamp and the IP
03The submission is rate limited by IP
The stored record shown as a compliance receipt: name, verbatim consent sentence, source URL, timestamp, IP — /api/marketing/demo-request. Sample data — no customer information appears here.
How it works
  1. 1A logged-out visitor submits the form
  2. 2The record captures the person, the verbatim consent wording shown on the page, the page URL, the timestamp and the IP
  3. 3The submission is rate limited by IP
  4. 4The response never echoes stored content back
Why we built it

The demo form on the public site looked like it worked and stored nothing at all — the confirmation text on the page itself admitted it was not wired up. That was worse than a lost lead. The texting programme filed with the mobile carriers named that same form as the place people agree to be contacted, so a reviewer following the trail would have found a form that demonstrably captured no agreement, putting the whole registration at risk. The form now creates a consent record — who agreed, to what exact wording, from which page, when, and from what address — and it stores the wording word for word rather than pointing at it, because site copy changes and the record has to keep meaning what it meant the day it was signed.

The problem
  • Messaging-compliance review requires provable, dated, verbatim opt-in evidence
  • Changing site copy destroys the meaning of a referenced consent
  • A prototype form silently captured nothing
Sound familiar?
What you get
A consent record that stands up to carrier review
The wording shown on the day is preserved even after the site changes
Demo requests reach a person instead of disappearing

See it on your own jobs

Twenty minutes, your numbers, no slide deck. We’ll build one of your real buildings in front of you and send you the estimate link at the end — yours to keep either way.

or keep browsing features →